• Home
  • CLiF Blog
    • Conferences and Workshops
    • Reports and Minutes
    • Tips and Resources
    • Professional Development
    • Job Postings
  • Meetings
  • Projects and Events
  • Research Help
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Brill includes new statement on the ethics of publishing provenanced texts

January 22, 2020 Posted by David Ratzan under News, Professional Ethics
No Comments

The publication of texts and objects remains a core activity in ancient studies, but the last two decades have witnessed a heightened sensitivity to the importance of provenance, both as a necessary object of scholarly investigation and as a central tenet of professional academic ethics. Recent scandals related to faked manuscripts (e.g., the so-called “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife”) and looted objects or stolen objects or texts (e.g., the alleged theft and sale of Oxyrhynchus papyri by Prof. Dirk Obbink) have proved to be object lessons in the scholarly and ethical obligation to take a careful and critical stance on issue of provenance when researching and deciding to publish any text or object.

Multispectral image of the “New Sappho,” published by Dirk Obbink with a problematic provenance in 2015. For the most recent developments on this piece, see Roberta Mazza’s blog: https://facesandvoices.wordpress.com/2020/01/13/news-on-the-newest-sappho-fragments-back-to-christies-salerooms/

In a heartening development, academic publishers, under pressure from their authors and their scholarly societies, are now beginning to accept responsibility for provenance. The revelation that at least five of the texts from the Museum of the Bible published in Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection, Vol. 1, edited by E. Tov, K. Davis, and R. Duke in 2016 without adequate provenance are very likely forgeries led to an open letter to the publisher in 2018, in which the signatories asserted that

This episode again demonstrates the urgent need for publishers as well as academics to exercise due diligence, through their peer reviewers, in checking that publications of antiquities, including ancient texts, acquired recently on the market give a full and annotated discussion of the acquisition and provenance history. We strongly suggest that Brill and other publishers treat this as seriously as they do copyright, and in their instructions to authors and contracts include a clause requiring the author or authors to be responsible for providing a full and proper explanation of the provenance and legitimacy of such recent acquisitions.

Brill has now responded by including a new paragraph in its editorial handbook (p. 7) on provenance, which I reproduce here:

Unprovenanced Artifacts: When presenting ancient artifacts, especially but not necessarily for the first time, authors publishing with Brill are required to follow the relevant society policies of their field, including but not limited to those of ASOR, SBL, AIA, and SCS (links provided below), concerning provenance and authenticity. Such artifacts include, but are not limited to, ancient texts, such as papyri, inscriptions, cuneiform tablets, and codices.

ASOR (http://www.asor.org/about-asor/policies/policy-on-professional-conduct/)
SBL (https://www.sbl-site.org/assets/pdfs/SBL-Artifacts-Policy_20160903.pdf)
AIA (https://www.archaeological.org/pdfs/AIA_Code_of_EthicsA5S.pdf)
SCS (https://classicalstudies.org/about/scs-statement-professional-ethics)

I will note that ancient coins are not called about above in the list of named classes of artifact (although the way the policy is written it would seem to include them). This is, perhaps, a tacit recognition that the numismatic market is so large and the collaboration of private collectors so necessary for research, that a strict provenance requirement may be impracticable. (See, for example, the collection and acquisition policy of the American Numismatic Society.)

For those interested in keeping abreast of developments related to provenance, publication and the antiquities market, particularly as it touches on papyri, Roberta Mazza’s Faces and Voices and Brent Nongri’s Variant Readings blogs are required reading.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

« Part I: Challenges and Changes in Humanities Publishing with a spotlight on Classical Studies
FCLSC Annual Meeting 2020 Agenda »
Recent Posts
  • Annual Meeting 2023 (VIRTUAL)
  • ISAW Library and the FCLSC to host panel Dec. 15, 2022: Excavating the archeological data cycle: Use, publication, and reuse
  • Ancient Makerspaces 2022 at the SCS/AIA Annual Meeting, Jan. 7, 2022
EU/EEA Privacy Disclosures
RSS SLUB Dresden: Open Philology Project
  • NEU: [Nachrichten und Anzeiger für Naunhof, Brandis, Borsdorf, Beucha, Trebsen und Umgebung], Band 1939-11-14
  • NEU: [Nachrichten und Anzeiger für Naunhof, Brandis, Borsdorf, Beucha, Trebsen und Umgebung], Band 1939-11-28
  • NEU: [Nachrichten und Anzeiger für Naunhof, Brandis, Borsdorf, Beucha, Trebsen und Umgebung], Band 1939-10-28
RSS AWOL
  • The Valediction of Moses: A Proto-Biblical Book
  • Thucydides in the ‘Age of Extremes’ and Beyond. Academia and Politics
  • Open Access Journal: Patristica Nordica Annuaria
RSS The Library of Antiquity
  • This week’s post was eaten!
  • Five tips for… exam season!
  • Help with Latin Texts: Musisque deoque
  • Help with Latin texts: Introduction to scansion
  • Help with Research: Using Tesserae for intertextuality, part 4
Classics Librarians Forum powered by WordPress and The Clear Line Theme. Site hosted by the Center for Hellenic Studies. Background design courtesy of Brad Busenius. Image of Colosseum by David Iliff. License: CC-BY-SA 3.0. Image of Erma di Dioniso by Giovanni Dall'Orto.

By clicking "I Agree", you agree to the use of cookies. EU/EEA Privacy Disclosures

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close